Those changes went into effect on January 1, and include a new approach to Judge Advocate General JAG review of cases that do not qualify for appellate review. Prior toArticle 66 of the UCMJ provided for an automatic appeal to the service court of criminal appeals CCA for every court-martial in which the sentence included the death penalty, a bad conduct discharge, dishonorable discharge, or dismissal, or confinement for one year or more. Any general courts-martial where an accused was found guilty but did not receive a sentence that met the requirements under Article 66 was reviewed by the office of the appropriate JAG under Article 69 a.
For courts-martial, such as special or summary courts-martial, that did not fit into either Article 66 or Article 69 aan accused could apply for review by the office of the JAG under Article 69 b.
Additionally, if the JAG acted on a case, and the applicant was unsatisfied with that action, he or she could apply to the CCA for an appellate review. It is now reserved for cases where the sentence includes the death penalty, a bad conduct discharge, dishonorable discharge, or dismissal, or confinement for two years or more. The new Article 66 did create an additional category of cases eligible for appellate review, although it is not automatic.
An accused can file an appeal in a case where the sentence includes confinement for more than six months. All courts-martial that are not eligible for appeal to the CCA, either through automatic review or upon filing, are now automatically reviewed by the office of the JAG.
Once this cursory review is complete, an accused can apply for another review by the JAG under the revised Article With these changes, fewer cases are automatically appealed, but the creation of a right to appeal for servicemembers with lower sentences actually makes appellate review available in more cases than before. For those who were convicted at summary courts-martialor a special or general court-martial where the adjudged sentence does not qualify them for appellate review, an automatic review will now be done by the office of the JAG.
Following this review, an accused has an opportunity to file an application to the JAG for an additional review. If the JAG accepts the application and takes action on the findings or sentence, then the accused may be able to get their case in front of the appellate court.
Unlike the previous version of Article 69, the appellate court can only review cases where the JAG has actually taken action. An accused who applies for Article 69 review by the JAG and is denied review, or is granted review but then denied any corrective action, will not be able to get their case before a CCA.
Your email address will not be published. Please provide a brief summary of your situation. If you are inquiring about an upgrade to your discharge please include what service you were in, what type of discharge you received and the date of your discharge, along with the circumstances surrounding your discharge. Thank you. Disclaimer: The information you obtain at this site is not, nor is it intended to be, legal advice.
You should consult an attorney for advice regarding your individual situation. We invite you to contact us and welcome your calls, letters and electronic mail. Contacting us does not create an attorney-client relationship. Please do not send any confidential information to us until such time as an attorney-client relationship has been established.
Pre JAG Review Prior toArticle 66 of the UCMJ provided for an automatic appeal to the service court of criminal appeals CCA for every court-martial in which the sentence included the death penalty, a bad conduct discharge, dishonorable discharge, or dismissal, or confinement for one year or more.
What These Changes Mean With these changes, fewer cases are automatically appealed, but the creation of a right to appeal for servicemembers with lower sentences actually makes appellate review available in more cases than before.
Leave a Comment Cancel Reply Your email address will not be published. Recent Accomplishments. By William Cassara November 8, By William Cassara October 5, Read more. William E. Cassara- Military Law Attorney. Start with a Free Consultation. Name Please enter your name. Email Address Please enter a valid email address.
Thanks for subscribing!In order to be convicted of desertion, the prosecutor must prove beyond a reasonable doubt the accused was absent with the intent to remain away permanently by arguing the accused:. The prosecution must also prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the service member deserted with the intent to avoid hazardous duty or to shirk important service by demonstrating:. The service member may also be subject to Article 85 if they attempt desertion.
In order to be prosecuted for attempted desertion, the prosecution must prove:. Desertion is completed when the service member leaves their unit, organization, or place of duty without authority and with the intent to remain away permanently. Changing their mind and returning in a timely manner is not a defense.
The intent to remain away permanently at any time during the absence may be proven through the use of circumstantial evidence by the prosecution. Service members convicted of an Article 85 violation face a maximum punishment of dishonorable discharge, forfeiture of all pay and allowances, and forced.
If the offense occurred in a time of war, death or an extended confinement sentence may be directed by a court-martial. If you or someone you know is facing Article 85 charges for Desertion, you need to speak with a Military defense attorney right away. Please call Crisp and Associates Military at for a free consultation. Contact Us Now!A Promotion Review Board PRB is convened to reconsider the promotion status of promotable officers identified or recommended for removal from a promotion list due to misconduct or sub-standard performance.
We usually see a PRB for adverse information identified during the post selection screening process. Instead, it is enough to generate a PRB if you have something adverse in your records that was not seen by the promotion board. Once you receive the official notification of a delay of promotion and a referral to a PRB, you will typically have 14 days if you are active duty or 30 days if you are a reserve soldier to submit a rebuttal.
Your rebuttal needs to be organized in such a way to provide you with the best opportunity to be retained on the promotion list. Our office has handled over 50 PRBs in the last year and a half. We have consistently received positive outcomes based upon our ability to present the most persuasive arguments for our clients.
Upon receipt of your rebuttal, a PRB will be convened to consider your records. A PRB is usually conducted within days of receipt of your rebuttal, but may take longer due to board composition and availability. The board is comprised of six individuals who are all senior to the Soldier being reviewed.
The board will conduct a file evaluation and consider the basis for the PRB consideration. A majority of the members of the board must agree on any recommendation. From initial PRB notification to final Secretary of the Army decision, you are usually looking at anywhere from 12 to 18 months. You will receive notification of the final PRB results in one of two ways. If the Secretary of the Army retains you on the promotion list, you and your G1 will receive notification via official military email.
The email will have the memorandum from the Secretary of the Army and another memorandum that addresses your promotion and any back pay and allowances that may be due. A request for orders will then be processed to effectuate your promotion. If the Secretary of the Army removes you from the promotion list, your G1 will receive notification via official military email.
You will then be notified by the chain of command of the removal decision. Any removal will count as a non-selection. If you are removed, you will be considered by the next regularly scheduled selection board.
However, that reconsideration cannot take place within 30 days from receipt of your notification of removal. Understanding the process of a PRB will help you as you not only prepare your rebuttal, but also manage your future assignments. In the ideal case, the process will result in your retention on the promotion list, back pay, and ability to transfer onto your follow-on assignment without too much impact to your career.
If you are facing a PRB, do not leave anything to chance, reach out to our office for a free initial consultation. Understanding the PRB Process.Occasionally Soldiers get into trouble and become subject to some form of formal punishment where he is judged by members outside the unit. Because he or she is being judged by strangers who don't know him, character statements will be required for his defense. A character statement helps judges, Commanders, First Sergeants, and other strangers make fair decisions by providing a factual description of a person's character.
The people who will read your character statement don't know the individual personally, want to judge him or her fairly, and are depending on you to accurately and honestly describe the subject's character.
The most effective and meaningful character statements are those written by people who have known the accused person for a long time and who can be considered to be impartial.
If you are asked to write a character statement, don't worry if you can't write well.
The important thing is that you cared enough and took the trouble to write. Usually, when things get to the point where character references are requested, the person is in potentially serious trouble and his career is on the line. He will be grateful for any effort on his behalf. And the members who will be judging the case don't care if you use bad grammar. They just want to get an idea of the person's history so that they can make a fair decision based on the evidence.
Type your statement and print it on good quality paper. Your statement will represent both you and the subject and its appearance will have some influence. Make it as presentable as possible. Use plain bond paper and the official memorandum format. To do otherwise would hurt your reputation and possibly make you subject to UCMJ action. In general, character statements have three sections: Introduction. Normally a single paragraph of a couple of sentences explaining who you are rank, place of work, etc and your relationship with the subject co-worker, friend, supervisor, etc.
This is important. The reader will automatically assign a certain level of credibility to the letter based on the relationship. The more distant the relationship, the more credible the letter will be perceived to be. The body is the majority of the letter. It can be one or several paragraphs.Articles 77 through of the UCMJ are known as the "punitive articles. Many will also likely have civilian court cases as well if other local laws were broken too such as driving drunk to rape or murder.
Chapter 4 of the MCM includes, and expands on the punitive articles. The articles are broken into the following sections:. Each of the punitive articles of the UCMJ is listed below with a brief description of the offense the article covers. The list is long and fairly explanatory of the chargeable offenses of the UCMJ. Its purpose is to make clear that a person need not personally perform the acts necessary to constitute an offense to be guilty of it.
Article 85 - Desertion. Article 87 - Missing movement. Article 88 - Contempt toward officials. Article 89 - Disrespect toward a superior commissioned officer.
Article 90 - Assaulting or willfully disobeying superior commissioned officer. Article 91 - Insubordinate conduct toward warrant officer, noncommissioned officer, or petty officer. Article 93 - Cruelty and maltreatment. Article - False official statements. Article - Misbehavior of sentinel or lookout. Article a - Stalking. Article - Larceny and wrongful appropriation. Article a - Making, drawing, or uttering check, draft, or order without sufficient funds.
By Full Bio. Rod Powers was the U. Read The Balance's editorial policies.
Military citation guide.
Continue Reading.Under Article of the Uniform Code of Military Justice, any member of the armed forces who believes himself or herself wronged by his or her commanding officer may request redress. A discretionary act or omission by a commanding officer, under color of Federal military authority, that adversely affects the complainant personally and that is.
If the problem is not addressed and fixed by the commanding officer, a formal complaint Article can be made to a superior officer higher in rank to the officer who is responsible for the problem.
This will trigger an investigation into the problem by the court-martial convening authority over the commanding officer against which you brought the initial complaint.
Any retribution or reprisals for filing an Article can be the basis for additional complaints. Even before you request redress, which always comes before you file an Article complaint, consider orally conveying to your chain of command that you are contemplating submitting an appeal for redress in pursuit of an Article complaint.
2019 brings changes to military justice system
One option for this is to use the open door policy to meet with your commanding officer. In a polite and formal tone you could suggest something similar to the following:. Before you file a request for redress or an Articlewe suggest that you call the GI Rights Hotline at Address the initial request for redress of wrongs to the lowest ranking officer in your chain of command who is responsible for the problem; include these four items:.
Remember that this letter can be seen as a threat. If the wrong is not addressed and fixed after the deadline in the initial request, you can submit a formal complaint.
This should be submitted through your chain of command beginning with your immediate supervising superior officer. Be sure to include your initial letter requesting redress and any supporting documentation.
Reminders: Be polite and avoid making any overt threats. Thank your chain of command for their time. Make multiple copies. For Navy or Marines, see Footnote . Reminders: Be polite and formal. Make multiple copies to keep and to give to your immediate supervising superior officer. Include a copy of your initial letter requesting redress.
UCMJ Changes JAG Review for Courts-Martial
Any member of the armed forces who believes himself wronged by his commanding officer, and who, upon due application to that commanding officer, is refused redress, may complain to any superior commissioned officer, who shall foreword the complaint to the office exercising court-martial jurisdiction over the officer against whom it is made.
The officer exercising general court-martial jurisdiction shall examine into the complaint and take proper measures for redressing the wrong complained of; and he shall, as soon as possible, send to the Secretary concerned a true statement of that complaint, with the proceedings thereon. A discretionary act or omission by a commander that adversely affects the member personally, and that, for example, is:.
This article allows military members to seek redress from any superior other than their commanding officerincluding superiors not in their chain of command. Article complaints are submitted via the commanding officer of the complainant.
This form must be completed in its entirety, unless a particular subparagraph, such as that providing for an explanation for untimely submission, does not apply. Encl: 1 list individually all documents enclosed with the complaint to support the complaint, including written request for redress, response to request for redress. Rank, name, SSdesignator: b. Current command: c.Article is one of the most powerful rights under the Uniform Code of Military Justice UCMJbut it is one of the rights least known and least used by military personnel.
Under Article of the UCMJ, "any member of the armed forces who believes himself or herself wronged by his or her commanding officer" may request redress. If such redress is refused, a complaint may be made, and a superior officer must "examine into the complaint. The right even extends to those subject to the UCMJ on inactive duty for training.
Matters appropriate to address under Article include discretionary acts or omissions by a commander that adversely affect the member personally and are:. Within 90 days days for the Air Force of the alleged wrong, the member submits his or her complaint in writing, along with supporting evidence, to the commander alleged to have committed the wrong.
There is no specific written format for an Article complaint, but it should be in normal military letter format, and should clearly state that it is a complaint under the provisions of Article of the Uniform Code of Military Justice.
If the commander refuses to grant the requested relief, the member may submit the complaint, along with the commander's response, to any superior commissioned officer who is mandated to forward the complaint to the officer exercising General Court-Martial Convening Authority GCMCA over the commander being complained about.
The officer may attach additional pertinent documentary evidence and comment on the availability of witnesses or evidence, but may not comment on the merits of the complaint. Special Note: Article clearly states that complaints may be addressed to any superior commissioned officer. However, only the Air Force regulations allow the complainant to bypass their chain of command when filing a complaint.
The Army requires that the complaint is filed with the "complainant's immediate superior commissioned officer. By Full Bio. Rod Powers was the U. Read The Balance's editorial policies. Continue Reading.